The Math Surgeon

The Math Surgeon
The Math Surgeon StrickCo

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Communicating with Project Teams & Stakeholders



The Art of Effective Communication Through Email.

Effective communication is beneficial to planning an instructional design project.  How can project managers effectively communicate with team member?  Face-to-Face, online communication and voicemail are the common ways of communication.  As I listened to the multimedia program “The Art of Effective Communication” (Laureate-media.com), I can clearly perceive how effective one way of communication may be more acceptable than others.

As an asynchronous learner, I use multimedia sources and email for much of my communication.  As I was reading the email information, the message was well displayed and I comprehended the reasoning for the email.  The participant needed some reports in order to complete her deadline of producing work.  Was the email effective in relaying the message?  I would say yes because the email was direct and to the point. The only negative aspect to email is that people may not respond.  I truly believe “if you find you have to write a very long email to do justice to the subject, you may be better off having a face to face talk. Long emails tend to breed long replies” (People Communicating, 2009-2010).  Even when I communicate to my cohort, project team or coworkers, I will send direct and to the point emails.  Most of the time the emails turn into instant messaging because the conversations are so straightforward.  In this way, I can identify with this method.  With voice-mails, there is a similar comparison because voice-mail messages tend to be direct also.

   
    
The voice mail recording in the program did have a lasting effect on how I recalled the message.  I was able to hear the tone and really get a feel of the importance of the needed document.  The way a person communicates can be a determining factor in a project.  Stakeholders and internal clients need to be a part of any type of instructional design project, making a good impression by voicemail to communicate issues is a rubric for success.  Voicemail communications appear to be highly useful especially in the techno world of web2.0 and the busy lifestyles of the working force individuals.  I must say after I head the same message in voicemail, I did get an urgency to contact the client right away or just respond back if not by voicemail then by email.  The visual modalities of message had the same effect on me.

Communicating Through Face-to-Face
Conversations.
I found this experiment to be very interesting.  As I listened to the presenter state how important, the data in the report was to her project,   I actually saw and heard the sincerity in her face, voice and presence as she sympathized with the workload of the receiver.  This was the same message displayed three different ways, but I really seem to get a different outlook on the message from the face-to-face presentation.  In any type of face-to-face business meeting whether it is in a conference room or an asynchronous environment where everyone is video conferencing, the project team must present themselves in a professional manner and/or in a manner that is conducive to their stakeholders.  “Through communication people exchange and share information with one another, and influence one another’s attitudes, behaviors, and understandings” (Kramer, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Portny, 2008, p. 357).  For this reason, alone I felt like the face-to-face communication has the greatest impact on stakeholders.

Any time clients, internal and external customers, and stakeholders are involved in a project there are going to be multiple forms of communication.  Is one communication more effective that others?  Probably not, but communication has to depend on the clientele, the environment and the stakeholders.  It is more likely that multiple types of communication will be prevalent in business.  Communicating by email allows project members to be direct with ongoing progress and issues.  Voicemails enables the client to listen to the presentations of any concerns or updates with project needs.  Most of all face-to-face allows a visual that sets a precedence over the atmosphere of the team.  All of these effective ways of communicating are beneficial to any project.  I utilize all forms of commutations when I am working on a project with a team.  I have learned from watching the multimedia program that face-to-face had a lasting impression because it actually gave the team members, stakeholders, internal and external clients the ability to watch a team member voice her concerns and request documents needed for a project or work assignment.  The appearance and tonality of her speech would make a positive impression on a team member as well as a stakeholder.  

References
Kramer, B. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Portny, S. E. (2008).Project management planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. (pp. 356-370). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Laureate-media.com. (Producer) (n.d.). The art of effective communication [Web]. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/EDUC/6145/03/mm/aoc/index.html
People Communicating. (2009-2010). Effective email communication. Retrieved from http://www.people-communicating.com/effective-email-communication.html 


3 comments:

  1. I agree with your assessment that the face to face method was the method that had the greatest impact. I was able to see that her body language, tone, sincerity all matched. "The ability to communicate well, both orally and in writing, is a critical skill for project managers" (Portny, et al, 2008, p. 357). I believe that the voicemail was the next effective method. When it comes to email, it is subjective, therefore it is open for interpretation. Additionally, long drawn out email have a tendency to get ignored or deleted. I know this is true in the realm of education. So we learn to kept it short and simple.

    References
    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is no replacement for face-to-face communication. During face-to-face communication you can read body language, hear the tone of voice, and respond to the other person immediately in real time. These are things that you just cannot get from an email or a voice mail. I agree with your assessment that face-to-face communication is the best way to communicate with stakeholders, team members, and clients. The key to successful project management is effective communication-sharing the right messages with the right people in a timely manner (Portney, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008).

    References

    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that face-to-face communication is good; however a combination of two or all three would be better. The information that we are trying to share is important and people should be polite and respond back to the person that tried to contact them. Even with a face-to-face chat, sometimes people cannot remember what was said. Dr. Stolovitch mentioned that anything discussed in person should be followed up by written communication. A memo will suffice to include the purpose, the situation, a possible solution, and should require team members to sign-off (Laureate Education, Inc., 2012).


    Laureate Education, Inc. (2012). Communicating with stakeholders. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1373694_1%26url%3D

    ReplyDelete